Friday, April 4, 2014

The scope and study of Udi local government of Enugu State

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1     BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 
          Man in his environment encounters a lot of difficulties such as physical and social factors in the environment. His ultimate goal is to conquer both the physical and social problems of his environment and to achieve this objective, he utilizes available human and material resources. In the course of man acquainting himself with his immediate environment and finding solutions to problems in the environment, physical and social development take place. Development, therefore, arose from the need to find solution to problems of human environment.
          The quest for development made for the Federal government to create the necessary reforms that enable the government at the third tier play her complementary role. The Federal government of Nigeria, through the 1976 Local Government Reforms, explained local government as follows:
          “Local Government is Government at local level exercised through representation councils established by law to exercise specific power within defined areas” (Government print: 1976)
          A political division of a nation (In a Federal or State system) which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs including the power to impose taxes to exact labour for prescribed purposes.
          There are 774 Local Government Councils in Nigeria, an average of 21 per state. In Enugu state where Udi Local Government Area emanates from, the local government area are 17 in number.
          There are condition for the creation which has to be taken into consideration. People that has common culture, affinity and are close with the required population would be easily to be considered to be given local government. The likely problems within the area should be considered. The Ibos lead an independent life of theirs for they like to provide for themselves more basic needs which they could get through mass participation in providing such as food, roads, shelter and protection. Their communities were organized in such a way that most of their needs were provided by the people as a body or by individuals on groups within the community. Hence, the communities that have common affinity and almost common problem should be tied as a local government.
          The development centres as they were created by Governor Chimaroke Nnamani around 2007 was to enable development to get to the grass root. The government within her 17 local government recognized by the Federal government created 54 LDC and that is Local Government Development Council. The centres were to ensure that development is extended to other parts of the mother local government. This 17 local government that is 54 Local Development Council carved out in Enugu State was also the pattern Lagos State created about 54 or 74 local government and they wanted the Federal government to fund the Local government  development council. The Federal government withheld the allocation and asked the Lagos government to revert to the old local government. The fourth tier of government as being practiced by some government is the town union. This would enable the development to get to the town stretching from the local government to local development council and then the town union. It makes development faster and accessible to the people that were concerned if there would be checks and balances.
1.2    STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
          The study focus on the local government system. A case study of Udi Local Government Area of Enugu State (1999-2009).
          From our background exposition, it is important to note that the problems of local government in Nigeria and in fact, Udi local government area in particular are multi-faceted.           Despite the justification for the establishment of local government and its inevitable importance to the people at the grass root level; Udi rural populace in particular, this tier of government seems not to have justified the reasons for which it was established.
The questions that summarily come to one’s mind are:
-      Why has local government not lived up to its expectations?
-      What are the causes of those seemingly conspicuous weaknesses?
-      What are the challenges of the local government?
-      And how can those weaknesses be corrected and the challenges met?
1.3        OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The Nigeria State created local government of the third tier of government whose objective is to ensure effective, measurable and efficient service delivery to the people. Unfortunately, in spite of this aim, autonomy to local government became a mirage, shifting sand.
          The autonomy so created was hijack by the State and Federal government that they do not allow the third tier to function well. The fund so far allocated to the third tier of government often time were misused by the people trusted with the mandate of the poor masses. In fact there is a lot of maladministration in the system.
          There are situation whereby the people entrusted with the fate of the masses were not professionals or may be half baked educationally, the tendency is that whatever action that is taken may not address the problems of the people. The poor identification of a peculiar problem people have coupled with poor allocation of fund tend to set development programmes backwards. There is also inadequate staffing.
          A lot of issues that hinder the local government is that there are non uniformity and corruption in the systems and the operators tend to call it a unified local government system. They would have allowed each local government to operate at her own frequency. There would not be building of bridges where there are no flowing rivers. The local government where such problem is not peculiar to would not be disturbed and fund is allocated for such programme would divert the fund. There is much intra ethnic interest going on within the system.
          The local government should be allowed to operate on their own. The different local government in the country should be allowed to be managed by professionals who know the where without. The system is faced with various difficulties. Udi local government is not an exception in these difficulties.
It is also hoped that this study will stimulate interest in local government in order to evolve mere effective approaches to local government administration means of achieving balanced national development.
1.4    SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
          This study is very significant in that it goes a long way to offering suggestions for improvement in rural development with the ultimate aim of improving the economic and social conditions of the communities and integrating them into the life of the nation thus contributing fully to national progress.
          It is also hoped this study will stimulate interest in community theorists in order to evolve more effective approaches to rural diversifications as means of achieving balanced national development.


1.5    SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
          The scope of our study is Udi local government of Enugu State, as a point of contact to other local government areas of Enugu State Nigeria.
          However, a number of handicap to the researcher in the period of this work. The most basic handicap was lack of fund on the part of the research to get to all remote villages in Udi local government area in order to obtain the bird’s eye-view report. In effect, the researcher tried to visit a reasonable member of communities that help her to come to a convincing conclusion.
          Another factor that proves no less a modeling handicap was the question of time since the researcher was at the same time facing other compelling necessities as a final year student.
          Finally, although there may have been some work done on Udi local government area as a study subject, but most of them were either unpublished or presented in a blazed frame which render them irrelevant to our researcher. On the side of unpublished works, we only laid reference to the authoritative works of classroom lecture. And to the other, we avoided to ensure non-sentimental presentation or representation. 




CHAPTER TWO
2.1    LITERATURE REVIEW/ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
          It is pertinent to note that some scholars have done some interested works on this topic under study.
          Here, I will dwell heavily on the concepts of local government system in Nigeria and Udi Local Government Area in particular.
          According to Agi (2002:103), He said that there has been no universally accepted definition of the term local government. Thus, like every other concepts in the field of the social sciences, the concept of local government is faced with institutional and authoritative bias from people of the Lexicol Icon.
Agugu (1997:18) defined local government as a government at the grassroots level of administration meant for meeting peculiar grassroots need of the people. The concept of local government involves a philosophical commitment to democratic participation in the governing process at the grassroots level. This implies legal and administrative decentralization of authority, power and personnel by a higher level of government to a community with a will of its own performing specific functions as with the wider national framework.
Also according to Lawaly (2000:60) Local government can be defined as that tier of government closet to the people, “which is vested with certain powers to exercise control over the affairs of people in the domain”
A local government is expected to play the role of promoting the democratic deals of a society and co-coordinating development programme at the local level. It is also expected to serve as the basis of socio-economic development in the locality.
          Appadorai, (1975:287) defined local government as government by the popularly elected bodies charged with administrative and executive duties in matters concerning the inhabitants of the particular district or a place.
          Thomas Jefferson (1816) defined local government as a political and administrative unit that is empowered by law to administer a specified locality. The new Columbia Encyclopedia (1975) 4th edition defines local government as a political administration of the smallest sub-divisions of a country’s territory and population (with such other features as, a continuing organization, the authority to undertake public activities, the ability to enter into contracts, the ability to collect taxes and determine a budget.
          It is discovered from the above three definitions that local government is related as a political administration geared towards administering a specified locality. The federal government of Nigeria, through the 1976 local government reforms, explained local government as government at local level exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific power within defined areas.
          On the other hand, Andrain (1972) defines local government as “A political subdivision of a national or regional government which performs functions that are culturally defined as local in character, which in nearly all cases receives its legal powers from the national or regional government but possesses some degree of discretion in the making of decisions, and which normally has some taxing, powers”.
          According to the United Nations Division of Public Administration (Abubakar 1993:4) local government is defined as “A political division of nation (in a federal or state system) which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs including the powers to impose taxes or to exact labour for prescribed purposes.
          Also the Encyclopedia Americana, International Edition (1978), volume 17, defines local government as “a political subdivision of national government or in the case of Federal systems, a subdivision of regional government”.
          W. A. Robson, in the Encyclopedia of the social services, defines local government as involving “The conception of a territorial, non-sovereign community possessing the legal right and the necessary organ to regulate its own affairs. This, in turn, presupposes the existence of a local authority with the power to act independently of external control as well as the participation of the local community in the administration of its affairs.
          According to Egwurube in Ademolakun (1988:157), local government is defined as, “a government at the local level exercised through representative councils with statutorily defined powers to initiate and direct resources allocation and resources location among a given range of prescribed functions within delimited jurisdictional boundaries”.
          Ozor (2004:2) in the other hand gives his own view of local government as a concept and a practice.
He noted that “Local government is a defector government (having Legislative, Executive and Judicial capabilities) operating within the ambit (jurisdiction) of (an) other higher government).
          Okoli, (2000) noted that local government is a creation of national government and it’s inferior. He viewed it as the lens through which the people view the national government and its activities, and it is the vehicle which transports peoples yearning to the national government and also as the telescope that draws the national government nearer to the grass root.
           Though all the definitions and views of local government from different scholars may tend to vary, yet they expose features characteristic of local government and they include that:
Ø  Local government is government at the local levels;
Ø  It comprises elected members, such as Chairman and Councilors
Ø  It has its autonomous existence and endowed with a legal status;
Ø  Special powers are reserved for it;
Ø  It exists within a defined territory;
Ø  It is seen as a distinct tier of government
Ø  It must provide avenues for the promotion of the welfare of the members of the community;
Ø  It provide authority over a given population;
Ø  It can impose taxes and incur expenses.
From the above features or summary, we can conclude that local government in its commonest explanation is the government closest to us at the grass root level.
2.2    HYPOTHESES
          The following hypotheses apply to our study and they include:
(i)           Udi local government area does not represent nor pursue rural development of its rural communities.
(ii)         Udi local government area today lacks the requisite conditions or rather constitutional authonomy that guarantee rural development.
(iii)       Udi local government area is a devolution of Enugu State government, which has affected all segments of her communities and deprive her the responsibilities of an authonomy which by principles are stated in the constitution (1999:12) of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.


2.3    OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE KEY CONCEPTS
Local Government:        Several scholars and institutions have given their definitions of the term and institution of local government. However, Professor E.O. Awa defined the term local government as follows:
          Local government refers to a political authority set up by a nation or state as a subordinate authority for the purpose of dispersing or decentralizing political power.
          Local government can also be defined as “a political sub-division of a nation or (in a federal/system) state which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs, including the powers to improve taxes or to exact labour for prescribed purposes. The governing body of such an entity is elected or otherwise locally selected.
          Guidelines for local government reforms in Nigeria define local government as government at a local level exercised through a representative council established by law to exercise specific powers and functions within defined areas.
Development: Nnoli defined development as a process involving the individual group and society in an upward movement from a situation of low productivity, low level of skill and organized capacity to higher level of labour.
          Development could be seen as a process through which the various facilities of man are developed to actualize his various aspirations of development which include socio/political, cultural environment. Development is oriented towards the satisfaction of human needs within his specified environment.
          Community: A community may be referred to as a group of people interactly among themselves in a geographically defined space and time.
          Rural/Community development: Rural development is defined by UNESCO, as the process by which the effort of the people are united with those of the government to improve the social, economic and cultural conditions of communities.
          Thus, Lek (1975:20) defined rural development as ‘improving the living standards of the mass of low income population residing in rural area and making the process of their development self sustaining. In line with this, G.A. Odenigwe (1977) argued that it is a system of local administration under which communities and towns are organized to maintain law and order, provide some limited range of social services and public amenities and encourage the co-operative and participation of the inhabitants in joint endeavour toward the improvement of their condition.
          Rural development is also defined as a strategy designed to improve the economic and social life of the people in rural areas.
          The international co-operation: Administration sees community development as a process of social actions in which the people of a community organized themselves for planning and action and the individual plans with a maximum reliance upon community resources and supplement these resources when necessary with services and materials from government and non-governmental agencies outside the community. (cited in Okoli, 1985:14)
          According to Akinbede (1985) rural development is directed to the modernization of the rural areas. It involves a broad spectrum of issues among which are problems of agricultural modernization, rural industrialization, job creation, transport development and provision of adequate housing and shelter for rural inhabitants.
          Elekwe (1992) sees rural development as a process through which the people in the same community first of all discuss and define their goals and objectives and then plan and act together to satisfy them. It is also a process by which the efforts of the people themselves are united with those of the government to improve economic, social and cultural conditions of communities in order to integrate these communities into the life of the nation and enable them to contribute fully to the national progress which requires citizen participation.
2.4    THEORETICAL FRAME WORK
          Our choice of theoretical frame work of analysis here dwells heavily on people centred approach. This approach was developed from the intellectual discussions of Fred W. Riggs (1982) and colleagues in the book ‘Public Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society?
          According to them as adapted in Aba (2000:73), ‘The people contred approach’ pays complete regard to the material condition of the rural populace and consideration for their aspirations. The people-centred approach therefore places emphasis on self-reliance and the economic advancement of rural dwellers.
          The use of this approach is justified by the following conjectives.
1.   Since it places emphasis on the condition of the rural people of the rural communities, we shall assess Udi local government area to the extent it has impacted on the lives of the rural people and communities under her jurisdiction.
2.   The approach equally pays attention to the self-reliance and economic advancement of rural dwellers. We shall consequently asses the degree of interventions of Udi local government are to the aspirations of Udi people and communities for self reliance and economic advancement.
With the above specifics, we shall do our assessment or research based on development index as provided or otherwise by Udi local government area to its rural people and communities since its inception as a local government area-third-tier level government.
2.5    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 
          In the course of this work, relevance information are gathered for the success of this work.
          The following methods are applied:
(1)         the consultation of written materials such as test book, newspaper and magazine
(2)         the searching through internet
(3)         face-to-face interview of the native, community leaders and local government officials of the Udi Local Government
2.5.1           SOURCES OF DATA  
          The data for this study were generated from two major sources namely; primary and secondary sources.
Primary Sources of Date:
          These include data generated from the filed, interview and questionnaire instrument were used to generate the primary data.
Secondary Sources of Data:
          These are data from already existing documents and literature for this purpose, a great deal of books, journals, periodicals, internet articles monographs, seminar and research papers, government document and unpublished research materials were collated and studied. These complement the primary data and they were also used to verify the primary data.
2.5.2           POPULATION OF THE STUDY
          The population of study cut across different occupations. It comprises 100 people made up of career civil servants and farmers. These groups of people represent the population study for this research within Udi local government area.
2.5.3           SAMPLE SIZE/SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
          It is extremely difficult if not impossible for study an entire population. Thus for a research endeavour to be more practical and realistic, there is a need to select some members of the population to represent entire population. In this study, a sample size of one hundred staff and farmers were chosen to represent the Udi local government area. This entails that one hundred (100) questionnaires were produced and distributed.
          In determining the sample populations stratified and sample random sampling techniques were used.
2.5.4           METHOD OF DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
1
 
          The data gotten through the questionnaire instruments were presented in tables. Each table shows the response distribution of a question item in the questionnaire. The frequencies of the response options were shown and their corresponding percentages worked out using the formular N X 100
Where N = Number of respondents
           T = Total number of the respondents
           100 = Percentage
           I – A Unit
          In analyzing the data, the frequency and simple percentage were used. The decision rule is to accept any option that is endorsed by a simple majority of the respondents.
CHAPTER THREE
3.1    BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON UDI LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA
          Udi division was an authority that could be linked to Oji River province of the then Eastern (later Anambra and now Enugu State) of Nigeria. In 1967, under the General Gowon’s administration, Nigeria was divided into twelve states. This was redoubled by Murtala Mohammed administration in 1976 during the reform that gave Nigeria the former nineteen (19) state structures. More local government areas emerged therefore in the 1991 states/local government creation (under the General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida administration of 1985-1993).
          Udi Local Government is bounded by the Coordinates: 60191N 70261E, 6.3170N 7.4330E. It is bounded on the North by Igbo-Etiti, on the South by Enugu North, on the East by Enugu East and on the West by Eziagu local government area all in Enugu State. Udi can be referred to as people living West of the Coal City, Enugu State. The headquarters is in the City of Udi town.
          The Accessibility of Udi is easier because of the improved development and Urbanization in the area. It is accessible by road, air and mobile communication. 9th Mile Corner in Udi serves as a junction or stopping place for the entire travellers coming to Enugu from the North, South and part of South East.
          However, the area has a good network; most of the roads are tarred while others were well graded.
3.2    COMPOSITION AND POPULATION
          The area has an area of about 897km2 and Population of 234,002 at the 2006 census. From this local government four new development centres were created by Governor Chimaroke Nnamani Administration in the year 2003. These development centres include: Ezedike, Ojebeogene, Udi and Ugwunye local government development centres.
Ø  Ezedike local government development centre comprises of Akpakwume, Nze and Oghu
Ø  Ojebe Ogene local government development centre comprises Awhum, Ebe, Abor, Ukana, Okpatu, Umulumgbe and Umuoka
Ø  Ugwunye local government development centre comprises of Amaozalla Affa, Egede, Affa, Amafia Affa and Amokwu Affa.
Ø  Udi local government development centre. It comprises Udi town, Obioma, Abia, Agbudu, Obinagu, Umuaga, Nachi, Oji Amokwe, Enugu Amokwe, Etiti Amokwe, Uwani Amokwe, Eke, Ngwo Asaa, Imeama Ngwo Assaa, Ameke Ngwo, Nsude Uboji Ngwo, Amankwo Ngwo.
It is interesting to let you know how the name Enugu is gotten from Ngwo.
According to Ikechukwu Ude-Chime in his story of the people we now know as Ngwo, a part of today’s Udi local government area. Ngwu Nwangwuako was a great hunter from Neke. He has ten children known collectively as Ngwuo Ili. One of the sons was Amaudeneogu, whose name his descendants adopted for their village and, because of the location of their village on a hilltop “enuugwu”, they became Enuugwu Amaudeneogu. So Enugu is an Anglo adulteration and shortening of the word “Enuugwu Ngwo”.
All these towns or cities fall inside Udi Local Governemnt Area.
3.3    POLITICAL AND SOCIO-CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS
          It was discovered that before 1976 reform, that Udi like most communities in Igboland are republicans from time immemorial. They had no kings, and they had no organized military or police force. In fact, there have no formal judicial nor penal system.
          And it is on this condition that Ichie NOO Udala of Umuaga on June 19, 1973 stated that “Before the white man came we have no Chief that saw the affairs of the town. But we had several institutions that helped us organize our activities. The government of this town was not vested on man. In the olden days, each village had a person that we could now call a chief to head the town’s political and administrative activities. This man was normally the oldest man of that village, and was called Onyisi ani. Within this village we have another man that heads the affairs of the “lineage” or Umunna called Okenye Umunna. During any case affecting the whole town, the ndi ishi ani, village heads would meet and discuss effectively the issues involved.
          And so it was until a certain Udi man from Eke named Ozo Amulu Onwusi married a beautiful lady from Ebe named Chinazungwa Ijeonyeabo. They had a son, Onyeama. He grew up to become the nearest Udi man having one identifiable ruler in living memory.
          During the colonial period, Udi did not swallow colonialism hook, line, and sinker. Everyone, black or white could settle in Udi and co-exist constructively and peacefully. However, when the European tourists turned around to rule, the people refused the concept of taxation without representation.
          Chief Onyeama n’ Eke acquiesced to the tyrannical repudiation of popular participatory politics (Oha ne eze). The people revolted. So this spirit of revulsion at oppression was reenacted in the Udi Revolt and the bloody coal miner’s strike (Iva valley, Enugu) on November 18, 1949 which signaled the beginning of the struggle for independence. It is no coincidence that Udi was the first political capital of lands east of the Nigeria. The capital was only moved to Enugu after the discovery of Coal in Udi Hills.
          In the present day, Udi Local Government Area which involves democratic system of government, the head is the Chairman of the Local Government Area, Sole Administrator for Local Government Development Centre and Councilors down to traditional rulers.
          Culturally, Udi has a certain commonality of culture, but it varies as much as cultural diversity in Igbo land. They include: Odo festival which occurs in northern parts of Udi (Odo ozo area), while Mmanwu appears more from Oshie to Neke communities. Eke is a town of both Odo and Mmanwu. Umuabi had the strongest attachment to the Mmanwu phenomenon; Nachi, much less so. Umuaga; besides its strong Mmanwu culture, has the popular rites of rebellion called “Okomoyo” during which the young are allowed to revel all-night long under the supposedly watchful eyes of the older folk.
          Moreover, other traditional practices include, marriage rites, New yam festival, Title-taking rites such as “Ichi Ozor”. They believe in the sacredness of Ani, the earth deity, and in the supremacy of Chi ukwu (Almighty God). Each town in Udi has at least one major deity, a being force (alusi) to which a shrine is built. In the table below are some towns in Udi Local Government Area and their various deities:
            Town
    Major Deity (alusi)
Udi
Umuaga
Abia, Amaokwe and Udi town
Abia
Okpatu
Awhum
Umulumgbe
Affa
Ani Udi
Nneche Umuaga
Aniobodoishiokwe
Onu Eke Oga
Affia
Ukwuakpu
Ugwuedem
Dinapata

          When the white men came, they came with their religion and their method of Education. The towns in Udi local government areas embraced both their education and their religion. The Udi north are predominantly of Roman Catholic denomination while the Southern Udi embraced CMS (Anglican Church).
          It was the politic in religion that made it that Onyeama a paramount Chief within the Udi enclave did not allow the Church Missionary Society to penetrate more into Agbaja area where he controlled. Even though he openly desired no part of Christianity, he invited and encouraged church missionaries – to teach his people the ways of the white man. When the CMS would not teach English, but in Owere dialect of the Igbo language, Onyeama expelled them and brought in the Roman Catholics, on the condition that they teach in English and Latin and let his people speak their own dialect of Igbo! From his kingdom, the Catholic Church reached all parts of northern Igboland, Ogoja and Benue areas. He encouraged serious economic development, including mineral exploration and railway construction linking Enugu with Port Harcourt. This Kingdom stretched even down to Nsukka areas of which most of the towns have more of Roman Catholic Churches than CMS. Through the establishment of their religion they also introduced their education which enabled people to interact with them. The churches so far established helped to curb some of the devilish habits of the people. As they embraced these big religious bodies they also allow the existence of other churches. In fact they are not inclined only to traditional religion they practice Christianity to the core.
          The motives of their education were to prepare ground for the exploitation of the hinterland so that their language could be interpreted as to enable them get what they wanted. The Udi people gained exceedingly from them as they not only interpreted but they delved into other field of human endeavour. The first Igbo medical doctor was Dr Simon Ezevuo Onwu, son of Ozo Offianaecheafa of Amaozalla Affa. The first Nigerian World Court Judge Justice Charles Dadi Onyeama, a contemporary of Dr Onwu was also an Udi son from Eke.
          There were a lot of prominent men in Udi that shone like bright star among whom were Justice Philip Nnaemeka Agu and Anthony Aniagolu, Chief Gabriel Onoh the father of Chief C.C. Onoh. There are Professors like Odenigwe, Egudu, Aneke, Chime, Nebo and others that could not be included in this write up. There were also great teachers, technocrats and technicians that had contributed immensely to the welfare of the Local government and Nigeria at large.
          Under this political dispensation the son of Udi, His Excellency, Bar. Sullivan Iheanacho Chime is the governor of Enugu State. Other intelligent and well educated ones occupied other positions in Enugu State and they are men from Udi enclave.
It is important to note that, no Udi town speaks exactly the same dialect as the other. It is obvious to detect the differences. The different towns that made up Udi local government have different taboos. For example, the people of Umuaga do not eat snails, in Ngwo, Afia usu market is located beneath giant cotton tree on which bats habit in their thousands. Though eating bat is not prohibited, no one would be allowed to kill any of the bats at the giant cotton tree. Oshie communities curiously do not inter marry, for they are descended from one man; curious because intra-marriage occurs in these communities. Intermarriage is virtually zero between that people of Nsude, Eke, Amaokwe, Abia and Udi.
3.4    OCCUPATION AND SOURCE OF REVENUE OF THE AREA
          The occupation of the inhabitants of Udi Local Government Area is predominantly agriculture. They involve in agricultural activities such as cultivation of cassava, yams, cashew trees, stringed beans, vegetables, oil beans, tropic fruits and assorted agricultural products.
          Some population embarks on trading since there are areas like 9th Mile Corner which is a booming place for business. For those who want natural drinks, the best palm wine in the whole wide world “Aneke Achime” flow from Nkwo Agu market in abundance to compliment the best “Okpa” (Udi bread) on earth. So Udi is said to produce the best palm wine.
          The land near or close to 9th Mile Corner is blessed with a natural aquifer which is very close to the surface of the earth. So the area serves as a good source of pipe borne water which is used in all part of Enugu State and even beyond. Also because of this aquifer, the largest brewery in West Africa (Amah brewery) and the major bottling companies ranging from Coca-Cola bottling Company Plc, Limca and Seven Up to create employment to the people of Udi Local Government Area and generate revenue for the Udi Local Government Area.




















CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1    DATA PRESENTATION
          Here in this chapter, the collected data will be analyzed to reflect the research questions
Table 1:      Distribution of Respondents by Sex
Sex
Frequency
Percentage (%)
MALES
65
65
FEMALES
35
35
Total
100
100

Source compiled field data 2012

Table 2:      Distribution of respondents by age group
Age group
Frequency
Percentage (%)
20-30
30
30
31-45
30
30
46- more
40
40
Total
100
100

Source Compiled field data 2012



Table 3:      Distribution of respondents by academic qualification or level of education.
Education Qualification
Frequency
Percentage (%)
FSLC
20
20
WASC/GCE
20
20
NCE/HND/DEGREE
40
40
MSC/PH.D
20
20
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
Table 4:   How do you feel with the performance of Udi Local Government Area since the new democratic dispensation in 1999 to the present?

The first question in the questionnaire/interviews sought to know how each of the respondents feels with the performance of Udi Local Government Area since the new democratic dispensation in 1999 to the present. The opinions of the respondent are represented in a tabular form below.
Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Satisfactory
10
10
Fairly satisfactory
15
15
Dissatisfactory
55
55
Highly dissatisfactory
20
20
Total
100
100
Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the above table 100 questionnaires were distributed across the levels of respondents. 10 persons responded that Udi local government area has performed satisfactory, 15 responded to the option of fairly satisfactory, while 55 and 20 responded to the options of dis-satisfactory respectively. Therefore the total percentages were including to dissatisfaction.
Table 5:      What are responsible for your opinion in question one above       
          Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Availability of social amenities that creates happiness
18
18
Political interference, administrative ineptitude
39
39
Political interference lack of financial and administrative autonomy
43
43
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          The table above demonstrate the cause of feeling of respondents to the performances or non-performances of Udi local government area since 1999 to the present. In effect we discovered that the majority of the population of study believe that political interference, administrative ineptitude and lack of financial autonomy are highly responsible for the non-performance of Udi local government toward ensuring accelerated rural development in Udi local government area since 1999 democratic dispensation.
Table 6:      How many times were employment exercises under-taken by Udi Local Government Area since 1999?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Once
95 (2004/2005)
95
Twice
0
0
More than twice
0
0
None
5
5
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          The researcher discovered that since May 29, 1999, it was only once that employment exercise was carried out in Udi Local Government Area. Furthermore, the researcher observed that of the respondents, the 5 persons that responded to the “non option” were of the stack illiterate and unaware. However, the table demonstrates that Udi Local Government Area has only conducted one single employment exercise since 1999 to date.



Table 7:      What are responsible for the delays or failure to conduct employment exercise in Udi Local Government Area?

 Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Lack of local autonomy, State Government embanges, financial problem
75
75
Lack of qualified personnel for recruitment
0
0
Over-staffing and limited job vacancies
0
0
Lack of political will, corruption and nepotism
25
25
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the indication of the responses in the table we understand that both the literate and illiterate classes of the respondents believe that lack of political autonomy, state government embargo on employment, financial problems, occasional limited political will, added to corruption and nepotism have been responsible for the failure of adequate employment exercise in Udi Local Government Area.






Table 8:     To what extent is Udi Local Government Area responsible to your community’s demand?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Effectively
15
15
Periodically
10
10
Nonchalantly
75
75
Uninterested
0
0
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          The result above form the opinions of respondent indicated that Udi Local Government does not respond effectively to community demands.
Table 9:      What are responsible for her success or failure in (5 above)?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Due to credible seasoned leadership
15
15
Lack of credible, tested leadership
35
35
Corruption, political interference from higher authorities
50
50
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the opinion of the respondents, one glaring factors were responsible for the failure or delay of Udi Local Government area to respond to the individual demands of Udi rural communities.
Table 10:    Are your people being adequately consulted in choosing/electing the leaders of Udi Local Government Area?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Effectively
5
5
Periodically
15
15
Once
72
72
Scarcely
8
8
Not aware      
0
0
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the responses, indication shows that the people of Udi Local government area are scarcely consulted during the exercise of choosing their local government representatives. This does not imply that they were not aware of political time-table of political exercise. Rather, in their opinion, the choice of those who often emerged as their local government representative in the local government executive councils at various episodes were more or less chosen without regards to their choice persons.

Table 11:    How far has Udi Local Government Area impacted on your community in terms of provisions of social amenities since 1999 to the present?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Effectively
5
5
Periodically
15
15
Non at all
72
72
Uninterested
8
8
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From further investigations due to the nature of the responses to the above question, we discovered that many of the respondents chosen in our random selection have never felt the impact of the government. The five people that responded positively were discovered to have come from the constituencies of the Chairman of Udi local government council since the changes that took place between 2004 to the present.







Table 12:   What are responsible for its failure to provide adequate social amenities such as electricity, roads, pipe-borne water, hospitals/maternities and employment to your people?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Corruption among the leadership, political interference, lack of autonomy
85
85
Lack of political will on the political leadership
0
0
Lack of political awareness on the part of the people
10
10
No need for such in rural places
5
5
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the above investigation, the researcher found out that those people on the negative were more or less illiterate, aged and resigned to fate.







Table 13:   Of the available social amenities in your community they were provided by

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Udi Local Government Area
5
5
Udi Local Government with community efforts
8
8
Enugu State Government
72
72
Enugu State Government with Community Assistant
15
15
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          We understand that only two relevant sources were responsible for the provision of social amenities in Udi local government are to include Enugu State government and Enugu State government with Community support/self effort respectively.









Table 14:    Have you been paying taxes, rates, dues/levies to your Local Government (Udi) Area?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Regularly    
55
55
Periodically
15
15
Financially, Materially and kindly
10
10
None at all
20
20
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the response we understand that 20 of the respondents indicated were uninterested. They don’t pay tax due to the fact that they had nothing doing as youths within the age of 20-30 years of age. This does not indicate their adult but rather a consequence of their state of unemployment and therefore lack a veritable source of taxable livelihood.
Table 15:    Do you have co-operative societies in your place?
Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Yes
95
95
No
5
5
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          The impression here indicate that there are co-operative societies in various communities that make up Udi local government area. Hoever, the few respondents in the negative were of the illiterate, aged and unaware class form our interview reports.
Table 16:    Of what assistance has Udi Local Government Area rendered to the co-operative societies in your community?

Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Financially
16
16
Materially
4
4
Financially, Materially and Kindly
0
0
None at all
80
80
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the responses to the above question, we came to a conclusion that Udi local government area has not been rendering assistance to rural co-operative societies in the communities that make up Udi local government area.








Table 17:    How do you sustain your community co-operative societies?
Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Through loans from Udi Local Government Area
0
0
Through loans from leaders/financial institutions
45
45
Through self-help efforts like thrifts
50
50
Through (b) and (c) above
5
5
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From indication shown in this response it is obvious that the sources of sustenance of the Community/Rural co-operatives were through loans from the banks and financial intuitions and through self help efforts such as thrift system.










Table 18:    What development programme has been effectively executed in your community by Udi Local Government Area since 1999 to the present?
Options
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Political socialization through party politics
85
85
Infrastructural provision and development
5
5
Massive employment/ recruitment
0
0
None of the above
10
10
Total
100
100

Source Compiled from field data 2012
          From the responses to question 15, we understand that Udi local government area was more or less concerned with political socialization of the various communities. We sought to correlate this question with our initial question in the numbers with respect to the consultation of the localities (since they are spheres of political socialization) in process of choosing the leader of Udi local government council. Our discovery which did not indicate in our questions shows that the splees of socialization were more or less concentrated on party infacts, the programmes assisted by WHO has nothing to do with the areas of the rural infrastructures developments, employments opportunities and governmental assistance towards enhancing community/rural development in Udi local government area.
4.2    DATA ANALYSIS
          This section verifies the views expressed by the majority in the questionnaire using interview data and secondary data. This leads us to accept or reject the hypotheses.
          Udi Local Government Area does not represent rural/local development of its people and communities. From our opinion of rural development, and development it signifies a positive change that results in the elevation of a people to a higher level politically, socially, culturally and economically (Ezeani, 2000). This implies improvement in per capital income, Gross Domestic Production (GDP), provision of the requisite amenities that are equally further agencies of production, distribution and exchange (Igwe, 1998).
          From our investigation research work, we shall at this point dwell in testing our hypothetical statements, which pivoted our research attempts. We shall thus take them in turns.
Hypothesis One:   Our first hypothesis states this; Udi Local Government Area does not represent rural/local development of its people and communities.
          In testing the relevance of the above hypothesis, we can draw from the responses in questions 1, 3, 4, 13, 14, and 15. To which each of the questions and their numerical responses are represented thus.
How do you feel with the performance of Udi Local Government Area since the new democratic dispensation in 1999 to the present? Of the respondents 75% responded to the tone of dis-satisfaction. This denotes that Udi Local Government Area has not performed in area under investigation with the first question.

          The third question requests thus: How many time were employment exercise undertaken by Udi Local Government Area since 1999 and when? From the responses, it was only once and done between 2000/2001 (Enugu Gazettee) indicated by 95%.
          The fourth questions wishes to know the causes of delays or failures to conduct employment exercise in Udi Local Government Area since 1999. In opinion of the respondent two factors were responsible in the order of priority that lack of political autonomy and lack of political will, corruption and nepotism represented by 100%.
          The next question that is corroborates to the first hypothesis is question 13, which state thus: of what assistance has Udi Local Government Area rendered to the co-operative societies in your community? Of the above question, 80% of the respondents responded in the negative signifying that Udi Local Government Area has not been giving any significant assistance to the development of community co-operatives in Udi Local Government Area.
          The final question with which to test hypothesis is question 14 which states thus. How do you sustain your community co-operatives societies?
          Responses indicate that community co-operative societies in Udi Local Government Area are being sustained through loans from banks, financial institutions and self help efforts in the nature of thrifts. 
          From our statement of problem, we posed that ‘Based on infrastructural index, how far has Udi Local Government provided social amenities the cradle of economic and social growth of societies, for the development of her rural communities?
          Indication from the responses in the above questions, 95% indicated that Udi local Government Area has not ever embodied on any such programmes. Therefore Local Government Area as demonstrated by Udi Local Government Area not represent rural/community development. Therefore the first hypothesis is adjusted as relevant and carried as aptly.
Hypothesis Two:  
          The second hypothesis maintains that Udi Local Government Area today lacks the requisite constitutional autonomy that guarantee to rural development of her people and communities. In testing the above hypothesis, we shall draw from the responses in the following questions 2, 4, 6, and 9.
          Question 2 requests to know what were responsible for the negative outcomes in question 1, which invariantly wished to understand the feeling of the people with the performance of Udi Local Government Area since 1999. It was understood that administrative ineptitude, political interferences leading to lack of administrative and financial autonomy were responsible for their responses to question two, which by their percentage representative is 82%.
          Question 4 requests to understand why Udi Local Government delayed or failed to conduct employment exercises since 1999. At this, it was equally understood that it was lack of political autonomy that impelled the efforts to conduct employment exercise in Udi Local Government Area with the percentage representation of 75%.
          Question 6 requests to know what were responsible for Udi Local Governments failure to render assistance to community co-operative societies in Udi Local Government Area. In understood from the scores that 85% of them attested to lack of credible and tested leadership (since they are not consulted in choosing their leaders) corruption and political interference from higher authority thereby trampling on the autonomy of Udi Local Government Area.
          Question 9 requests to understand the causes of Udi Local Government failure to provide the necessary social amenities to the communities. Here we noted that 85% of the responses agreed that it was a consequence of corruption, political interference and lack of political autonomy of Udi Local Government Area to make decision for herself. In the light of the above hypothesis II is thus sustained and carried.
Hypothesis Three:         The third hypothesis states that Udi Local Government Area is devolution of State Government in Enugu State which has affected all segments of the responsibilities in Udi Local Government Area by the constitution f the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
          Schedule four, section 7 of the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria spelt out the areas of authority of Local Government Area in Nigeria. From investigations corroborated by the responses to question 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 we understand that the Local Government and Local Government Area in particular is not allowed by the state government to perform these constitutional functions. Rather, Udi Local Government becomes more or less an agency for the deliverance of the policies and programmes of Enugu State Government instead of being responsible for initiating, aggregating and executing public interests.         To this point, hypothesis three is equaling adopted and sustained.
          From the above hypothesis over view vis-à-vis our research findings, we can understand that more surface and thus a quick measure becomes emergent.








CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1    SUMMARY
          From our background information, we understand that Udi Local Government Area is made up of twenty three (23) communities as follows Akpakwume, Nze, Oghu, Awhum, Ebe, Abor, Ukana, Okpatu, Umulumgbe, Umuoka, Egede, Affa, Udi, Obioma, Abia, Agudu, Obinagu, Umuaga, Nachi, Amokwe, Ngwo, Eke and Nsude.
          From our investigations, we came to terms that even though there are a number of social amenities existing in the communities. We were made to understand that most or all those social amenities were not provided by Udi Local Government Area. Rather, they were provided by Enugu State Government in conjunction with community support efforts.
          Furthermore, in spite of the existence of the community co-operative societies in Udi Local Government Area, we discovered that Udi Local Government Area has not provided any assistance to the improvement of these socio-economic ventures.
          On another sphere, employment of qualified people remains a cardinal responsibility of government at all levels. Udi local government area as a level of government, though a third tiers and of lowest command of authority, is and ought to be as well privileged to ensure adequate recruitment of her qualified youths and adults. This ought to be one of the major responsibilities of a government that enjoys obedience to law of the citizens, compliance with the laws or bye-laws of the local territory and above it all, ensuring their payment of taxes, dues, levies and rates. Udi local government area is still found waiting in the area of recruitment of qualified personnel indigenes of Udi local government area.
          At the bottom-line of our research is to investigate the impact of Udi local government area in rural development. Consequently, we sought to understand as a guided norm what constitute development and especially with respect to the context under study. We posited that development is more or less an incredemental positive process that tantamount to the changes in the living standards that are no less a filliping to individual comfort.
          In cognizance of the above quest, we found out that Udi local government area, even as a progenitor of several local government areas in the former Udi provincial council, has not been of instrumental impact to the elevation of the rural communities. Rather, it has been the state government that has proved of relative impact toward the development of the rural communities that make up Udi local government area.
5.2    CONCLUSION  
          At this point, we wish to conclude this research project by restating thus: Udi local government area does not represent rural, local development of its people and communities. Udi local government today lacks the requisite constitutional autonomy that gives fillip to rural development of her people and communities. This is a consequence of political interferences of state government in the activities or programmes of Udi local government area since its creation. Udi local government area is a devolution of state government in Enugu State which has affected all segments of the responsibilities in Udi local government area by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. This is corroborated by the imposing of employment, usurpation of programmes (development) that ought to be initiated and executed by Udi local government area by Enugu State government and the command structure in the administrative systems in Enugu State that now renders Udi local government area and perhaps the rest of local government areas of Enugu State to the tutelage of Enugu State government.
          Thus, Udi local government area is more or less a tier of government that tantamount to a stage of the State government authority.
5.3    RECOMMENDATIONS
          At this juncture, it is pertinent to offer some relevant suggestions towards the improvement of rural development by Udi local government area thus:
          Local governments (which include Udi local government area) should be treated as a tier of government as accorded to it by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. By this, the State government should concentrate on issues that concern the joint interest of the state and allow local governments to function on their won merits and capabilities. The present practice of joint financial allocation existing at the state level should be dissolved forth with to allow the local government areas in the state the opportunity and autonomy to pursue their different local problems at their own paces. The monthly income/revenue and expenditures accruing to Udi local government council should be made accessible to the public. Through this measure, the public would be able to raise alarm whenever the local council officials go out of prescribed financial regulations. The people would be able to compare the various administrations to ensure a people-oriented development. The state/local office (SLGO) in the presidency should open offices in all the senatorial and local government areas across the country to monitor the adequacy of delivery of federation monthly statutory allocations to the entire local government areas in the country. This will help the local government areas in Nigeria to checkmate the extent and degree of interception of the monies meant for local government areas by their parent state governments.
          Public awareness other than party political activities should be instilled on all the communities to participate in the activities of the Udi local government area, so as to be able to raise alarm officially whenever and wherever official corruption is discovered. Such alarm would be channeled through the SLGO in their district to the appropriated authority for prompt corrective actions.
          The internal audit department of Udi local government and the State auditor general of local governments should be attached to the office of SLGO and recognized as federal monitoring offices in Udi and other local government areas in Nigeria for adequate monitoring.
          Finally, selection or election of leaders or political office holders of Udi local government area should be done at all time with the consent of the rural and entire people-oriented administration. This will help to accelerate development and by the inference rural development in Udi local government area.
          At this juncture, the researcher believes that if the above suggestions are in place, and in view of the fact that Udi people have been law-abiding, paying their taxes, rates, levies to Udi local government area adequately, the rural development question in Udi local government area would receive a vigorous attention.











BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Adrain, R. Charles (1992) local polities in international encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 4th ed. New York.

Agagu, A. A. (1997) “Local Government” in Kolawole, D. (ed) Readings in Political Science, Ibadan, Dekaal.

Appadorai, A. (1975) The Substance of Politics. New Delhi, Oxford University press.

Lawal, S. (2000) “Local Government Administration in Nigeria: A practical Approach”.
M. U. Akpan Pub Admin in Nig. Ikot Ekpere Longman Nig. Ltd. 1982

Odenigwe, G. (1979 encyclopedia of the Social S) “Mobilizing Citizen for Community Development under the New System of Local Government “in Administrative and Roland, L. (ed). The Local Government in Nigeria: Problem and Prospect: Ibadan; Heinemann Ltd.

Okoli, F. C. (2000) Theory and Practice of Local Government: A Nigeria perspective John Jacob’s classic publishers Ltd.

Ozor, Ebonyi (2004) Third Tier Government in Nigeria: Evaluation, Development and Future Ibadan: University Press

Robson, W. A. in Enclopedia of the Social Sciences, International Edition, -1978

The New Columbia Encyclopedia. 4th Edition
JOURNALS/ARTICLES
Agi S. P. I. (2002) “Local Government As a Tie of Government: Theoretical Problem” in Nigeria Journal of Public Administration and Local Government Vol. 11. No.

Okoli, F. C. (1985) Western Ideology and Community Development in Africa: A Nigerian case study to Ikenga Journal of African studies vol 7 No 1 and 2

GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS
Guidelines for Local Government Reforms in Nigeria Local Government Yearbook (1976)

The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 Section 7 schedule 4

INTERNET
^ “Post Offices-with map of LGA”. NIPOST. http://www.nipost.gov.ng/PostCode.aspx. retrieved on 17 May, 2011

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Udi, Enugu&oldid=511229964” retrieved 17 May, 2011

http://www.kwenu.com/history/udi/udi moehtm. retrieved on 12 July, 2011



INTERVIEWS
Ochiaka, Simeon Oral Interview about Udi Community and their deity on December 13, 2011

Ogbuzulu, Christian Oral Interview about Udi Local Government on December 16, 2011

UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Okafor KNC Self Help and Community development Unpublished Thesis, 1983 Sociology and Anthropology. UNN





APPENDIX II

PERSONAL DATA
I.       Sex Male        Female
II.      Age (a) 20 – 30       (b) 31 – 45       (c) Above -
III.     Educational Status (a) FSLC         (b) WASC/GCE 
          (C) NCE/HND/Degree         (d) Master/PHD         (e) Illiterate

1.       How do you feel with the performance of Udi Local Government Area since the new democratic dispensation in 1999 to the present?
          (a) Satisfactory       (b) Fairly satisfactory         (c) Dis-satisfactory
          (d) Highly Dis-satisfactory
2.       What are responsible for your opinion in question one above       
          (a) Availability of social amenities that creates happiness
(b) Political interference, administrative ineptitude
(c) Political interference lack of financial and administrative autonomy
3.       How many times were employment exercises under-taken by Udi Local Government Area since 1999?
          (a) Once        (b) Twice        (c) More than twice
          (d) None
4.       What are responsible for the delays or failure to conduct employment exercise in Udi Local Government Area?
          (a) Lack of local autonomy, State Government embanges, financial problem
          (b) Lack of qualified personnel for recruitment       
(c) Over-staffing and limited job vacancies
          (d) Lack of political will, corruption and nepotism

5.       To what extent is Udi Local Government Area responsible to your community’s demand?
          (a) Effectively          (b) Periodically         (c) Nonchalantly
          (d) Uninterested
6.       What are responsible for her success or failure in (5 above)?
          (a) Due to credible seasoned leadership
          (b)     Lack of credible, tested leadership
          (c)     Corruption, political interference from higher authorities
7.       Are your people being adequately consulted in choosing/electing the leaders of Udi Local Government Area?
          (a) Effectively          (b) Periodically         (c) Once
          (d) Scarcely             (e) Not aware      
8.       How far has Udi Local Government Area impacted on your community in terms of provisions of social amenities since 1999 to the present?
          (a) Effectively          (b) Periodically         (c) Non at all
          (d) Uninterested
9.       What are responsible for its failure to provide adequate social amenities such as electricity, roads, pipe-borne water, hospitals/maternities and employment to your people?
          (a) Corruption among the leadership, political interference, lack of autonomy              (b) Lack of political will on the political leadership            
(c) Lack of political awareness on the part of the people
          (d) No need for such in rural places
10.     Of the available social amenities in your community they were provided by
          (a) Udi Local Government Area
(b) Udi Local Government with community efforts      
(c) Enugu State Government         (d) Enugu State Government with Community Assistant
11.     Have you been paying taxes, rates, dues/levies to your Local Government (Udi) Area?
          (a) Regularly           (b) Periodically          (c) Financially, Materially and kindly
          (d) None at all
12.     Do you have co-operative societies in your place?
          (a) Yes          (b) No            
13.     Of what assistance has Udi Local Government Area rendered to the co-operative societies in your community?
          (a) Financially         (b) Materially         (c) Financially, Materially and Kindly
          (d) None at all
14.     How do you sustain your community co-operative societies?
          (a) Through loans from Udi Local Government Area
          (b) Through loans from leaders/financial institutions
          (c) Through self-help efforts like thrifts
          (d) Through (b) and (c) above
15.     What development programme has been effectively executed in your community by Udi Local Government Area since 1999 to the present?
          (a) Political socialization through party politics
          (b) Infrastructural provision and development
          (c) Massive employment/ recruitment         (d) None of the above





No comments:

Post a Comment